So many leads, which to monitor?
Jul 27th, 2010 by
RH-111
Print This Post
I’ve read many opinions over time about which EKG leads we should be monitoring and I’d concluded that my best 3 to monitor are II, aVL & aVF as the 3 that give the best all around picture of what’s going on. I’ve seen many medics that have their lifepak 12 set to monitor II, III and aVF which basically only gives you an inferior wall view, probably not a good thing to work with a blind spot like this. Along comes this article in JEMS and now I think I may have found the elusive perfect lead. Although it’s been around quite a while, its use in the prehospital setting seems to be virtually unheard of. I quote the important stuff below:
A New Lead The modified lead MCL-1 (originally called CL1) was introduced in 1968 – To run this lead, you keep the limb leads RA and LA in their standard position and place the LL electrode on the V1 position (the fourth intercostal space just at the right sternal border.) Select lead III on the monitor, and you’re now viewing lead MCL-1.
This configuration of leads gives a clear chest for cardioversion and defibrillation, and chest auscultation will also be easy. Lead MCL-1 closely resembles V1, so it offers many diagnostic advantages over lead II:
MCL-1 is the best lead for differentiating V-tach from SVT with bundle branch blocks.
You can immediately tell right from left ventricular ectopy.
In most cases, right and left BBB can be recognized.
Sometimes, P waves can be seen better.
See the rest here
I have a Philips MRx 12 Lead monitor and the 3 lead cable has a 5th cable marked V. This allows me to monitor any V lead including v4r if I’m so inclined
Pediatric EKG Differences
Jul 19th, 2010 by
RH-111
Print This Post
I came across this great article focusing on ECG differences seen with pediatric patients. This is quite important to really know as something as simple as a normal PR interval for an adult could signify a AV block in a child.
Electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation usually is taught in courses that focus on adults. For those who work in pediatrics, identifying appropriate parameters for infants and children is important. This article focuses on the differences between an adult and child’s ECG, differences in common arrhythmias (also called dysrhythmias), and unique treatment approaches to arrhythmias in children.
See complete article here: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0FSZ/is_3_27/ai_n18612073/
This chart sums some of it up:
Table 2. Rate and Intervals Based on Age
Age HR PR interval QRS interval
1 - 3 weeks 100 - 180 .07 - .14 .03 - .07
1 - 6 months 100 - 185 .07 - .16 .03 - .07
6 - 12 months 100 - 170 .08 - .16 .03 - .08
1 - 3 years 90 - 150 .09 - .16 .03 - .08
3 - 5 years 70 - 140 .09 - .16 .03 - .08
5 - 8 years 65 - 130 .09 - .16 .03 - .08
8 - 12 years 60 - 110 .09 - .16 .03 - .09
12 - 16 years 60 - 100 .09 - .18 .03 - .09
What is this EKG?
May 11th, 2010 by
RH-111
Print This Post
Can anyone tell me what this EKG is? Vfib in lead II and NSR in lead III? Checked all leads and no patient movement.
Patient was an 87 y/o female nursing home patient, unresponsive in respiratory failure secondary to pneumonia.
Normal deflection of ECG leads – reviewed
Jan 4th, 2010 by
RH-111
Print This Post
Been a while since we did cardiology so I wanted to do a quick review on the normal deflections you should expect to find in each lead of an EKG
Limb Leads
Lead I – Looks across top of heart with positive electrode at left arm – so QRS complexes are upright but not that tall
Lead II – Follows normal electrical axis of heart, top right to bottom left . All complexes should be upright and tall.
Lead III – Looks from top left towards bottom left – at this angle P waves may be inverted but QRS should be upright (more than in lead I)
Lead aVR – Positive on right arm, so everything negatively deflected
Lead aVL – Positive on left arm – similar to Lead I but this lead looks down AND to the right so QRS are upright but very small
Lead aVF – Positive at left leg, looking at bottom of heart. Electricity is coming right at this lead so QRS should be upright and prominent.
Chest Leads
Leads V1-V6 – R wave starts very small and S wave is prominent. As the leads progress the R wave is more prominent and S wave is gone in V6. This is known as R wave progression.
P Wave
P wave should be upright in Leads I and II as well as V3-V6
P wave always inverted in aVR
P wave usually upright in aVF and V3 but occasionally biphasic or flat
P wave is variable in leads III, aVL, V1 and V2 (upright, inverted, biphasic)
Inverted P wave in II, III and aVF and upight in aVR is diagnostic for a Junctional or low ectopic atrial rythm.
Most people say that your best view of the P wave is in Lead II – others say V1. The truth is that every patient is different, find the best one on your patients EKG and study that one well.
See this page for some quick review and this page
Nitrates and o2 in an AMI
Nov 18th, 2009 by
RH-111
Print This Post
According to the AHA, Nitrates should not be given both to someone with a systolic of less than 90 OR 30 or more points below their normal baseline!! (Also severe bradycardia <50BPM or Tachycardia >100BPM) This obviously makes sense, as someone with a normal BP of 160 needs close to that 160 to maintain adequate tissue perfusion. A BP of 130 will not cut it for him as he will be in a state of relative hypovolemia.
Also, with regard to O2, according to study published in the 70s high flow o2 may actually be detrimental to a patient experiencing an uncomplicated MI (i.e. no CHF, COPD, etc). This is because o2 is known to have vasocontrictive effects and as such by increasing afterload (increased peripheral vasoconstriction) you are reducing the cardiac output for a patient that really needs whatever he can get. The AHA it seems, advocates high concentration o2 only when the patient has an spo2 of less than 90% – Also see this study published in 2009 – relevant quote below.
Oxygen Supplemental oxygen is given because of the theoretical benefit of maximizing oxygen delivery in a patient with an ischemic condition. This was first recommended for myocardial infarction over 100 years ago. However, there have been several studies dating back to the 1950s demonstrating concerning harmful effects. Specifically, they have shown that when supplemental oxygen is given to non-hypoxic patients, it produces increased systemic vascular resistance and decreases cardiac output. In hypoxic patients, the data have varied between no effect to improvement. Our current practice is based on the first randomized controlled clinical trial done on the effects of oxygen therapy for MI patients. It showed a reduction in MI-associated enzyme elevation, but these results did not achieve statistical significance (p=0.08). Given the small numbers involved in this study (n=151), it may have been underpowered to detect an actual clinical and/or statistical effect (type II error), but the results are not sufficient enough to support the routine administration of oxygen to all MI patients. In line with this evidence, the ACC/AHA’s STEMI guidelines only recommend supplemental oxygen for hypoxic patients. It is worth noting that all but one of these studies were done before the advent of the pharmacologic agents, fibrinolytics, or PCI. In conclusion, the evidence is thin, and this highlights the need to re-consider the risks and benefits of oxygen therapy in both hypoxic and non-hypoxic patients, in the context of modern medical management of STEMI.
Comments welcome!
Prehospital 12 Lead ECG: Contiguous and reciprocal lead charts
Jun 15th, 2009 by
RH-111
Print This Post
Contiguous and reciprocal lead charts
Prehospital 12 Lead ECG: Contiguous and reciprocal lead charts
See this site for great 12 lead info…(reproduced below)
Here are some charts to help you identify and localize acute STEMI on the 12 lead ECG. Contiguous leads
What do we mean when we say leads are "contiguous"?
Contiguous leads are "next" to one another anatomically speaking. They view the same general area of the heart (specifically the left ventricle). For example, these states in the upper-midwest are contiguous, because they are all touching and in the same region of the country. The "inferior" leads (I, II and aVF) view the inferior wall of the left ventricle. Remember that the inerior leads make up the lower-left corner of the 12 lead ECG. The "septal" leads (V1 and V2) view the septal wall of the left ventricle. They are sometimes grouped together with the anterior leads. The "anterior" leads (V3 and V4) view the anterior wall of the left ventricle. The "lateral" leads (I, aVL, V5 and V6) view the lateral wall of the left ventricle. Leads I and aVL are sometimes referred to as the "high lateral" leads, because their positive electrode is on the left shoulder. Leads V5 and V6 are sometimes referred to as the "low lateral" leads because their positive electrodes are on the lateral left chest.
In addition, any two precordial leads that a next to one another are contiguous. In other words, V4 and V5 are contiguous, even though V4 is an anterior lead and V5 is a lateral lead. This makes sense when you consider that leads V4 and V5 are next to each other on the patient’s chest. It’s worth mentioning that the standard 12 lead ECG does a relatively poor job examining the lateral wall of the left ventricle, and does not directly examine the posterior wall of the left ventricle. That’s the reason we sometimes miss acute STEMI in the distribution of the circumflex artery. This image from Rescue One EMS Prehospital Program © 1999 Centric Medical Communications, Inc. illustrates the point nicely. This was from a class sponsored by Centocor (makers of the drug Retavase) that was taught by a Miami-Dade Fire Captain. In case you weren’t aware, Miami-Dade was the largest enroller in ER-TIMI-19 which was a clinical trial involving prehospital administration of thrombolytic therapy.
Think of it this way. There are 3 main epicardial coronary arteries, the right coronary artery (RCA), left anterior descending (LAD) and the circumflex (LCX). It stands to reason that approximately 33% of documented acute STEMIs should occur in the distribution of each of the 3 main arteries. But that’s not what we find. Most acute STEMIs are documented in the distribution of the right coronary artery or the left anterior descending. In other words, the standard 12 lead ECG does a relatively poor job examining the lateral and posterior walls of the left ventricle, so there’s a danger of missing STEMI in the distribution of the circumflex artery. That’s the main reason it’s so important to carefully analyze the right precordial leads (V1-V3) for reciprocal changes that may indicate posterior STEMI. You can also consider using modified leads V7, V8 and V9 to increase the sensitivity. Right ventricular infarction is another issue that will have to be addressed another time. Reciprocal leads What do we mean when we say that a lead is reciprocal? It means that during an acute STEMI, when ST segment elevation is present in leads that face the acute injury, ST segment depression will often be present in leads that face the "ischemic boundary". Many theories have been advanced to help explain reciprocal changes. I can’t go into all of them here, but consider this diagram modified from A Mechanism for ST Depression Associated with Contiguous Subendocardial Ischemia by Bruce Hopenfeld. Jeroen Stinstra, and Rob MacLeod. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophys, 15(10), 1200–1206, 2004. Computer modeling has shown that as the ischemic zone extends from the endocardium to the epicardium, it creates a relatively positive area above the ischemic zone, and a relatively negative area at the ischemic boundaries. This computer model helps explain why reciprocal changes may appear prior to ST segment elevation. Some authors have suggested that the first sign of acute inferior STEMI is a downsloping ST segment in lead aVL, and I have seen this happen many times. Regardless of why reciprocal changes occur, clinical experience shows that the most important reciprocal changes can be viewed between the high lateral leads (I and aVL) and the inferior leads (II, III and aVF). Keep in mind that reciprocal changes can be subtle, and may present as nothing more than a flattening of the ST segment in the reciprocal leads. *** Update 01/15/09 *** Check out this case at Dr. Smith’s ECG blog to see just how subtle reciprocal changes can be! And how they can prevent you from discharging a patient home to experience cardiac arrest! *** End update *** You will sometimes notice reciprocal changes in the anterior leads (V1, V2, V3 and V4). These usually represent reciprocal changes associated with injury of the posterior wall of the left ventricle . Since we don’t usually view modified chest leads V7, V8 and V9, we most often see these changes associated with acute inferior STEMI , because the posterior descending artery branches off the right coronary artery (RCA), which also supplies the inferior wall of the left ventricle. With anterior STEMI, the occlusion is often in the left anterior descending artery (LAD) which branches off the left main coronary artery. Depending on the patient’s coronary vasculature, the culprit artery, and the location of the occlusion, the blood supply may also effect the lateral wall of the left ventricle, which can create reciprocal changes in the inferior leads (sometimes very subtle depending on the stage of the infarct). Reciprocal changes may not always be present, but when they are present, it is very strong supporting evidence that the patient is experiencing actue STEMI. See also: 12 lead ECG – lead placement diagrams The problem of ST segment elevation
Intro to 12 Lead EKGs
Jun 7th, 2009 by
RH-111
Print This Post
Dr Bonaris – 12 Lead EKG
The three Is
Ischemia
Lack of oxygenation to myocardium
ST Depression or T wave inversion
may or may not result in infarct or Q wave
Injury
Prolonged ischemia
ST elevations (injury pattern)
usually results in an infarct may or may not result in a Q wave
Infarction
Death of tissue
May throw pathological Q waves (.04 wide and greater than 1/3 of height of R wave)
T to P is the baseline you compare to for comparing ST segment, do not use the the PRI!
T wave inversions may be normal in some leads, but think cardiac.
What to look for
ST elevations in two or more anatomically contiguous leads
T wave – tall and round – Tombstone pattern
12 lead EKG Injury Patterns
Lead
Location
Coronary
Reciprocal Leads
Notes
II, III, aVF
Inferior (IWMI)
RCA (LCA)
I, aVL
Always suspect RVI (40-50% of patients), use V3R, V4R (no nitro, first fluids small doses of MS – RVI patients are preload impaired – nitro or MS can precipitate sudden and catastrophic hypovolemia in these patients. )
V1, V2
Septal (SWMI)
LCA
-
V3, V4
Anterior (AWMI)
LCA
II, III, aVF
Widow maker, L Ventricle failure, CHF, Cardiogenic Shock
I, aVL, V5, V6
Lateral (LWMI)
LCA
V1, V2
V7, V8, V9 (Back)
Posterior
RCA or LCX
V1 throughV4
usually extends from of IW or LWMI
Evolution of MI
Hyperacute T waves – Tall Peaked- Suggestive of MI (Also hyperkalemia)
Tombstone appearance – ominous sign, severe
Reciprocal changes
A change detected electrocardiographically in a wall of the heart opposite the site of a myocardial infarction. In acute inferior wall infarction, reciprocal changes are considered a sign of more extensive myocardial damage. Not always present.
(Electrical alternans – seen in cardiac tamponade)
Some more from http://medinfo.ufl.edu/~ekg/Infarct%20&%20Ischemia.html
Coronary Anatomy: Relation to the Site of Infarct
The most common cause of Acute MI is sudden total occlusion of a major coronary artery.
Sudden total occlusion of the RCA (Right Coronary Artery) causes acute inferior MI and/or posterior or right ventricular MI (ST elevation in lead V4R helps diagnose RV infarction.). Mobitz I is common with inferior MI (the RCA supplies the AV nodal artery).
Sudden occlusion of the Left Main coronary artery leads to sudden death (from massive infarction).
Sudden occlusion of the LAD (Left Anterior Descending) artery leads to anterior infarction; bundle branch block/Mobitz II 2° AV block may be seen.
Sudden occlusion of the Circumflex artery leads to lateral infarction. In about 10% of patients this artery (rather than the RCA) also supplies the inferior and posterior walls of the left ventricle.
Note - Collateral development changes the above patterns.
EKG Interpretation – Heart Blocks
May 4th, 2009 by
RH-111
Print This Post
Andy Rodriguez
First Degree Heart Block
Not a true block
Conduction delay at AV node
All impulses are conducted to ventricles
PRI will be >0.20 consistently across the strip
Second Degree Heart Block
Intermittent
Some get through and some don’t
pathology can be in AV node or below in Bundle of His
pathology is often blended with other blocks
Mobitz Type I (Wenckebach)
Impulses encounter progressive delays at the AV node until one impulse is blocked completely
PRI starts getting progressively longer and then dropped QRS
All conducted QRSs present are tight, <0.12 and preceded by a P wave
Mobitz Type II
Can be regular or irregular, depending on conduction ratio
Usually a Brady rhythm
More than one P wave for every QRS
PRI constant on conducted beats can be >0.20
QRS <0.12
Conduction Ratios
2:1, 3:1, etc. two P waves for every conducted QRS
Third Degree Heart Block (Complete Heart Block)
All impulses generated by Sinus node are being blocked by AV node
Separate Sinus and Ventricular Pacemakers –
Complete disassociation between P waves and QRSs
Regular
Rate depends on whether its junctional or ventricular
P waves, normal and upright, more P waves than QRS
PRI – no relationship between P waves and QRS , occasional superimposed on QRS
QRS width depends on whether its junctional or ventricular
Heart blocks are best diagnosed using a 12 Lead EKG Machine . This and other used medical equipment can be found easily online.
Basic Cardiac Arrythmias -UPDATED
May 4th, 2009 by
RH-111
Print This Post
Download Excel Version Here
Sinus Rhythms
Rate
Rhythm
P waves
PRI
QRS
Name
Notes
60-100
Regular
Upright, Present, Before every QRS
<0.20
Narrow, <0.12
Normal Sinus Rhythm
< 60
Regular
Upright, Present, Before every QRS
<0.20
Narrow, <0.12
Sinus Bradycardia
> 100
Regular
Upright, Present, Before every QRS
<0.20
Narrow, <0.12
Sinus Tachycardia
60 – 100
Irregular, varies with resp rate
Upright, Present, Before every QRS
<0.20
Narrow, <0.12
Sinus Arrythmia
Sinus node fires faster during inspiration and slower during expiration
~
Regular – Missing entire PQRS
Upright, Present, Before every QRS
<0.20
Narrow, <0.12
Sinus Arrest
Atrial Rhythms
Rate
Rhythm
P waves
PRI
QRS
Name
Notes
60 – 100
Slightly Irregular
changes from beat to beat
<0.20
Narrow, <0.12
Wandering Atrial Pacemaker
~
Depends on underlying rhythm
Present but looks different than rest
<0.20
Narrow, <0.12
PAC
(Single ectopic beat)
150-250
Regular
May be visible before QRS
<0.20
Narrow, <0.12
Atrial Tachycardia or SVT
(If occurs suddenly during regular rhythm called PSVT)
A 250-350
Regular
None, F waves present (Sawtooth)
<0.20
Narrow, <0.12
Atrial Flutter
A >350
Grossly Irregular
None
-
Narrow, <0.12
Atrial Fibrillation
Junctional Rhythms
Rate
Rhythm
P waves
PRI
QRS
Name
Notes
40 -60
Regular
Inverted, during, or after QRS
<0.12
Narrow, <0.12
Junctional Escape Rhythm
~
Depends on underlying rhythm
Inverted, during, or after QRS
<0.12
Narrow, <0.12
PJC
(Single ectopic beat)
60-100
Regular
Inverted, during, or after QRS
<0.12
Narrow, <0.12
Accelerated Junctional Rhythm
100 -180
Regular
Inverted, during, or after QRS
<0.12
Narrow, <0.12
Junctional Tachycardia
Ventricular Rhythms
Rate
Rhythm
P waves
PRI
QRS
Name
Notes
~
Depends on underlying rhythm
None before complex
-
Wide >0.12
PVC
May occur Unifocal or Multifocal, may be Bigeny, Trigeminy or Quadgeminy, May occur as a couplet or as a run
150 -250
Usually regular
None
-
Wide >0.12
V Tach
Greater than 250 is called V Flutter
Grossly Irregular
None
-
-
V Fib
20 -40
Regular
None
-
Wide >0.12
Idioventricular Rhythm
> 40
Regular
None
-
Wide >0.12
Accelerated Idioventricular Rhythm
None
None
None
-
No QRS
Asystole
UPDATED 6/15/09
Sinus Blocks, Pauses and Arrest
In all cases, no P, QRS or T wave present – Impulse is blocked a SA node and Atria are never depolarized.
Sinus Block – Always a multiple of underlying P-P interval. can be more than one missing complex
Sinus Pause – Not a multiple of P-P interval. Shorter than three times the P-P
Sinus Arrest – Same as pause but more than 2 missing complexes (consecutive)